After giving it some thoughts, and understanding how powerful machine learning is and what it can do, it is still probably too soon to be worried that AI will take over our world. However, its capability is a wonderful tool for us as it can empower us in an innovative way, and I think this is rather the meaning behind these games.
First of all, the battle is merely in the game of Go. It is only meant to demonstrate the capability of machine learning, and how it is capable to improve itself by learning from others and itself. Then in combination of its uncanny speed in calculating probabilities in each possibility, would be able to solve complex problems and complete very difficult tasks - to the point that it can be better than humans.
However, in real life, there are so much more complex tasks that would still require human inputs in order to be carried out and accomplished. For example, think of our roles in creating arts, performing arts, negotiations, relationship buildings etc. Even though AI can have very high intelligence quotient in solving problems, it lacks emotion quotient (EQ), and this is what makes human input/interaction meaningful and crucial. A lot of times connections and emotions are the keys to getting the jobs done. For example, doing business requires solid relationships/partnerships - people like to do business with those they feel comfortable with and are able to feel connected to; performing the Chopin concertos require deep emotional understanding of the composer and the meaning of the masterpiece etc. All of which would not be achieved without the human part. Our civilization is much broader than just 'intelligence': there are emotions, values, virtues, manner, morale, spirits, religions etc, those are essential part of the civilization which AI does not possess (at least not today).
Furthermore, with the discovery and advancement of machine learning, we should utilize it as a way to assist us to look into things that we might have missed. As the developers in AlphaGo stated, machine learning might even be able to assist the healthcare providers in some day, by identifying problems that we have neglected to observe from individual incidents and cases, and by enough repetitions that translate to learning, coming up with information and ideas on what we should pay further attention to in order to reduce errors and improve the quality of healthcare.
So after all, although there was a clear 'winner' in the battle, it is not a competition between human and AI, but a demonstration of the possibilities and capabilities in machine learning. What can we do instead, is to take this opportunity to reflect on ourselves as human being, on how we can make the best out of AI. We need to have a solid understanding of what we are doing, what we are capable of, and then determine what are the things that we can delegate to AI to make our life easier. We can optimize the strength of AI as a way to make us better human beings by allowing us to achieve more than we could do before with better awareness or resources; then maximize our uniqueness (the human aspect) to innovate, to change, and to accomplish more great things for the world.
Another takeaway from the success of AlphaGo is its ability to "learn and master" the game by playing itself over millions of times through trial and error. It is a good example and a reminder for us that the old saying "Practice Makes Perfect" is still the key to success. Although we might not be able to do the same things a million times, with failure and willingness to succeed, we will gain wisdom and our possibilities are still endless.
Youtube recordings of the 5 matches played by AlphaGo vs Lee Sedol
Thanks for your sharing!
ReplyDeleteIt is very true that we, as human beings, could (or should!) be more "positive" about this issue. It could be reasonable though, especially it is humans who created AI, humans would feel inferior or kind of "threatened" after losing in a game which is well-known by its computational complexity. And I totally agree with what you mentioned that we should think about what we could make good use of AI (which is greatly improving) to assist our life, instead of keeping worrying (what would happen will happen! haha!).
I am really impressed by the discussion of humans' uniqueness against AI (for example emotions and values), because I have thought of some related questions before! Do you think AI has creativity? Or, to be more specific, can AI compose? I read some articles quite a long time ago which said there are mathematically finite numbers of songs (or combinations of musical notes) in the world. So, if we could talk about things out of the scope of numerous combinations by using AI, then it looks like AI can compose!? If yes, can this thought be extended to other fields of arts as well?
And, regarding the issue of emotions, I agree that AI could not express emotions without any input by humans, but could they learn if they have "sufficient inputs"? Like the playing of Chopin concertos, if there are enough recordings (of Chopin concertos, or Chopin's other works, or even from other composers?) available for AI to do analysis, maybe it could be possible (but at least not today)?
Thanks for reading!
Thanks for your comment Jasmine. You brought up a very good question here - does AI have creativity? Is it able to compose and innovate? I think the answer is yes, it can. AI has advanced so much to to point where we can programmed its learning style and thinking pattern, and allow it to be instilled with knowledge and information from humans. Just like the recent Microsoft "Tay" and the robot receptionist "Nadine", it could even develop 'personality' by interacting with humans.
ReplyDeleteIt seems very well that the AI could learn about different music genres by identifying and understanding the uniqueness in each composition, and somehow coming up with something on its own. However, does this mean it can compose "like" human by bringing in all the human factors? Does this 'artificial composer' know about other things besides music? For example, will it be able to compose a song in response to a recent event, in a specific genre? Will it be able to incorporate a popular Korean slang or buzzword into the Spanish lyrics? Will it be able to write a tribute song for David Bowie? I think it would be much more difficult to do so. To build a robot that understands culture, traditions, history, trends, and many aspects outside of music, in order to be able to generate meaningful compositions (and resonate with people), requires the AI to possess very unimaginable capacity and have the opportunity to be exposed to a variety of experiences in order to register the information in its memory. Not to mentioned it will also need to know what to do with this information and how it might be help contributing to music composition.
IMO, the success of music requires a lot of personal, human touch to it. A composer can use specific notes in order to reminisce his childhood; a singer can tell a bittersweet love story with the way she chooses to perform it. These are the genuine and human parts that "click" with the audience, and can not be surmounted by notes/voices that were "picked" by AI just because they were analytically proven successful.